When Will The Federal Reserve Begin Printing Money?

Not being an insider, I don’t know. However, here are some of the estimates: 1.When the S&P500 gets down to 1150 (currently at 1290) where it was last December. 2.When the 10 year Treasury yield gets down to 1.5% (where it was the last time they intervened.) 3.When we get a series of really bad numbers on the economy (like the Philadelphia Fed report last week.) 4.When Chairman Bernanke “sees” prices decline (i.e., Consumer Price Index) as he fears deflation. 5.When Chairman Bernanks needs to keep the dollar from rising too high (which hurts exports and the recovery) and because he needs to support the Euro to prevent a disaster. 6.When Chairman Bernanke needs to help the European Central Bank flood the financial system with liquidity if/when Greece votes to exit the Euro and austerity.

Are We Headed For A Recession Or Another Money Bounce?

May 16, 2012 As I have been saying for some time now, the U.S. economy is headed toward “another” recession within the next few months, maybe June or July. The only thing that will temporarily stop and reverse this trend is another huge stimulus package or more money printing by the Federal Reserve. Printing and spending more money will not solve our economic problems, it will only make matters worse in the long-term because the money will be gone and the debt will be even higher (Thanks Grandpa!) BUT, it will produce some hopium to lift the economic numbers and the market. This seems to be the politicians’ only solution to the problem. But, even this is getting more difficult to accomplish. In the first three months of this year, over $300 billion was “printed and pumped into the economy” yet GDP only increased a little over $150 billion. There are a lot of reasons for the view described above including: 1.Money Supply. With QE’s done and the “Twist” program about to end, the pace of money coming into the economy has been slowing down for a couple of months. The pace of money injection is as important as the amount and has about six month lag time. 2.Credit. The yield curve (the price of credit over time) is being artificially held down by the Federal Reserve forcing savers and investors to take on more risk to get any yield. However, for the past few weeks, the credit markets have been telling us that an economic slowdown is coming. For, example, the yield on the 10 year Treasury is down to 1.75% and on the other side of the coin, the price of high yield instruments have been selling off (pricing in recession risk.) 3.Economic Indicators. The forty some economic indicators that come out each month have been showing many negatives, regardless of the “Headline Spin” being used to make it sound like things are improving. For example, for the past month, the weekly “Unemployment Claims” have carried headlines stating that the numbers of claims are down from the previous week. Yet, each week, they report that the claims the prior week were adjusted upward resulting in the current week’s claims being less. Net result is claims were up for the month but they were reported down each week. Shouldn’t random adjustment go in each direction? 4.There are also a lot of headwinds to be resolved like the deficit ceiling (estimate we will have to raise it again in October), 2013 budget (September), the “Doc Fix” for Medicare (December), the “Bush Tax Cuts” (December), and lots more. Did I mention it’s an election year? Back to paragraph one. This economy is headed for another recession and the only way politicians know how to change that trajectory is by printing more money. Therefore, I expect to see some form of QE3 or Stimulus soon; maybe at the June Fed meeting.

Will The Fed Print More Money?

April 12, 2012

This is an important issue right now, especially in this election year. Consensus is mixed, depending on one’s view of the “recovery”, but the market appears to have melted up in anticipation of the Fed injecting more money into the economy. Then, when the minutes of the last Fed meeting were released on March 19th, the consensus of the committee was that the economy was slowly improving but they acknowledged that employment was still a concern. Therefore, additional accommodation (printing money) by the Fed may not be necessary. However, since then, the market has begun to sell off and one reason is its disappointment with the Fed’s position to not inject more money right now. Do you think the Fed really means this? Here are some thoughts from the different sides of this argument.

The Keynesians (mostly Democrats) View

In a recent article in the New York Times, Paul Krugman argued the following:
1. Because the Fed expects low inflation and high unemployment, the Fed should be much more accommodative in order to accelerate the recovery. If we don’t, we will choke off the recovery.
2. The reason we would not be more accommodative is the Republican’s misplaced fear of inflation.
3. But, we can’t worry about inflation; we should be more worried about employment. In fact, inflation of 4-5% would be a good thing. Not a bad thing.

The Keynesian-Lite (mostly Republicans) View

In a recent report written by Brian Wesbury of First Trust, he argued the following:
1. The Fed has finally admitted the economy has improved and took QE3 off the table. There is no need to print additional money.
2. Monetary policy has been accommodative, but monetary policy is not the driving force behind the market, profits are…and profit growth will continue.
3. The Fed will start raising interest rates before its stated date of late 2014. Increasing rates will keep inflation in check.

Capitalists/Austrian Economists View

1. The economy is still in recession as none of our problems have been solved. But, the Fed has already printed too much money and is prolonging the recession with additional injections of money. The only think they have accomplished is unsustainable debt and they are laying a foundation for inflation.
2. We have printed and spent $8.5 trillion dollars in the past four years. This money has raised nominal GDP. That’s because GDP is a mathematical model in which every new dollar created adds (arguably because nominal GDP has risen only $1.4 trillion) a dollar to GDP. But now the money has been spent, we have the debt and real growth has not occurred (8 million jobs lost, 7 million homes in foreclosure, banks under capitalized, interest expenses exceed 10% of income (tax revenues), wages have not kept up with inflation, sovereign, corporate and personal debt, etc.)
3. Now however, the pace of new money creation has slowed for the past two months. Because the money created with credit has been spent, the Fed has to create more money each year than it created in the previous year or the total amount of money supply contracts…. which contracts GDP.
4. Also, Bernanke and the Fed believe we are in a cyclical recession (normal, shallow) versus a systemic recession (major, caused by structural changes.) Therefore, they believe they can fill the spending “gap” with government spending which draws consumers back into the market and ends the recession. This recession is far more serious than a temporary gap in consumer spending.

Conclusion

This recession is far more serious than a temporary gap in consumer spending.
We have below trend growth and stagnant incomes and we have an election year. Do you think the politicians will print more money and kick the can down the road past the election or opt for austerity and a return into recession? I think the answer is they will print more money, but they need “an excuse” to do so (i.e., a bad jobs number or a market sell off or a war or?) because some voters are worried about our ever increasing debt. Therefore, we are now on a path toward more money, more debt or a deeper recession.

Is It Decision Time for the 2012 Economy?

The media has been reporting for some time, based on "expert" opinions, that we are in a recovery and that the economy is slowly getting better. There are some data points that are getting better. Afterall, we should get some nominal improvement after the government spent about $10 trillion in the last three years (40% of it borrowed) and the Federal Reserve printed another $3 trillion over the past four years. But, the problem is that it's only temporary. The improvement only lasts as long as the printing presses are running. The net is that the market is being held up by printing money but the economy itself is not improving much.

Now however, we are running out of previously printed money. Quantitative Easing (QE1 and QE2) and the Feds "Twist Program" are winding down. So going forward, we can't get an increase in nominal GDP growth. Therefore, GDP will now start to decline. For example, Goldman Sachs revised its estimate of GDP in the first quarter down twice lat Friday and Bank of America is now at 1.8% for the first quarter. We must print more money to get an increase in GDP.

Yes, both political parties know this and the Federal Reserve knows this as well. But, with current debt at close to $16 trillion, some people are saying no to more debt. Therefore, the government needs to "prove" we need more money printing. After all, elections will be here soon. So, the Federal Reserve needs some bad numbers now to justify printing more money. I wonder about Friday's jobs number. Maybe if gold and silver dropped in value, it would show that debasing the dollar by printing money wasn't the reason for its rise in value. Or maybe a quick hit to the stock market would generate enough fear to do the trick. And, oil needs to come down in price because you can't start a war with oil over $100 per barrel. Or?

The net is this; we could be at a tipping point. Either we side back into recession or we print more money and "jump start" the economy, again.

The Lack Of Consumer Spending Is The Problem, Right?

Everyone knows that what is causing the recession is the “gap” in consumer spending, Right? That is the explanation according to Keynesian economics and that’s what we have been told. So after spending trillions of dollars trying to fill the consumer spending “gap” and creating $15 trillion in debt; we have been told (Paul Krugman, et.al.) that we just didn’t spend enough.

Great, so we are now about to spend some more on: 1, a new “jobs” bill that will do nothing but add to the debt and accomplish nothing long-term and 2, a new Quantitative Easing Program ( QE3 or money printing) to help the banks and hurt savers.

Printing money does levitate the market, especially when the new printed money goes to banks who can then invest it in the capital markets and in higher paying foreign investments. BUT, consumer spending is not our problem. Here are some numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (dollars in trillions) that prove the point.

Year....................2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Government
Expenditures...........$4.14 $4.43 $4.73 $4.99 $5.26

Personal
Consumption............$9.52 $10.00 $9.74 $10.34 $10.45

Private Fixed
Investment
(Business
Spending)..............$2.26 $2.26 $2.12 $1.70 $1.72

This is telling us that the real problem is Business Investment. It is down by $539 billion or 23% from the peak in 2007; and running at about 76% of the 2006 level.

Isn’t this the real question: Why are businesses unwilling to invest and grow? Or is all the investment overseas where the business climate is more favorable?

More Hopium On The Way

Our down trending economy and markets may have begun to levitate again with Chairman Bernanke’s Jackson Hole speech last week when he announced the Fed would keep interest rates at zero for two more years (that would be 4.5 years total.) I believe this is just the beginning of “QE3” (generally defined as more money printing.)

Because there is some opposition to more stimulus and money printing (including three of the Federal Reserve’s Presidents and members of Congress,) the Government and the Federal Reserve have to “justify” more spending. In other words, there has to be enough “pain” to justify more spending and interfering with the economy. I believe we will get more fiscal stimulus and more money printing because we have, over the years, turned our economy (and education, health insurance, parenting, retirement, etc. etc. over to the government) and stimulus and money printing are the only way they know how to fix things. Besides, there is an election coming soon and fixing will take time.

There are two data points coming this week that may give the government the “justification” they need. One is the ISM-Manufacturing Report on Thursday. I suspect it will be more negative than expected. The second is the jobs report on Friday. I think the consensus is for about 75,000 to 100,000 jobs. However, the data over the past month is so negative that we may see a much smaller number and even a negative number for August or September. A negative number will defiantly get attention.

These events will be followed up by President Obama’s speech on September 5th when he will tell us what his “plan” is for restoring the economy and creating jobs. I believe it will be a bigger, more expensive program than we have had to date. It will have to get through Congress, but did I mention an election is coming soon.

Also, on September 21st Chairman Bernanke will announce the decisions made by the Federal Reserve Board. If the data is bad enough, we should get QE3 almost immediately. If the data is not bad enough, we may have to wait. But we should not have to wait very long as the economy is sliding further into recession.

In summary, we may get some bad news with the ISM-Manufacturing Report and the August Jobs Report which would negatively impact the market. But, that would be immediately followed up by the President’s new stimulus plan and the Federal Reserves’ money printing plan. This hopium will levitate the market, if big enough, until +/- next Labor Day. Another short-term “fix” and a worsening long-term problem.

Are You Ready For Labor Day?

A lot has happened over the past week or so. I just want to cover the Federal Reserve meeting today. Fed Chairman Bernanke stated after the meeting that we are basically in a recession (my interpretation) that will last for some time; and that he will hold interest rates down until at least mid-2013. This is the normal Keynesian and Keynesian-Lite reaction to a “consumer spending gap” (a reduction in consumer spending.). Fiscal and monetary policy has been doing this (low rates and printing money) for several years now and it is not working very well.

We know that increasing the money supply increases the GDP, but maybe low interest rates and printing money are not our problem and in fact, may be prolonging our problem. However, I think the Fed believes we are still stuck in a “liquidity trap” (over simplified: I (individual, bank, company) have some money and I could borrow more, but I don’t want to spend it or buy on time or invest it because I don’t know what the future holds and if I will be able to pay it back in this uncertain economy.)

The Fed believes, to get out of this liquidity trap, they need to continue to keep rates low and flood the economy with new money which will encourage people to spend and invest. Many think this might be difficult to do now considering the recent debt debate. But this is all the Fed and the government know how to do. They can’t create jobs or fix the housing foreclosure problem or expand free trade agreements, etc. Besides, that’s what a lot of people (like Paul Krugman, et. al.) are demanding. They want the government to do something”.

Now we have a second quarter revision to GDP on August 26th. I think GDP will be revised down from 1.3% to under 1% and maybe down to as little as 0.5%. Since we are obsessed with GDP that is a problem. Two quarters under 1% growth when we need 3% growth to effect jobs growth and unemployment.

Then we have another Fed meeting on August 29th. I expect Chairman Bernanke to announce that additional help (accommodation) will be coming soon. Then throw in the fact t that Congress gets back to “work” after Labor Day and the Presidential Election season is underway.

Therefore, my assumption of Scenario One (Print Until You Drop) is that the economy may not turn up but GDP (the arithmetic model we call the economy) will turn up on new fiscal and monetary initiatives. This will then “lead” the market higher.

There are a lot of implications to this scenario on the upside and the downside for both equities and income securities. Start now to position yourself for what is coming.

Moody's Has It Absolutely Wrong

July 18, 2011

There will be a market reaction to passing or not passing the debt limit. But it is time to start thinking about this problem as adults rather than as political party advocates. Moody’s comments the past few days are a prime example.

Moody’s, the credit agency has stated they are likely to downgrade America’s AAA credit rating if the debt limit is not raised.

Today, Moody’s stated that America should get rid of the debt limit ceiling altogether because it gives them a reason to downgrade our credit rating. This is not only illogical; it’s symptomatic of the way politicians, economists and pundits think. They almost always attack the symptom rather than the cause.

What Moody’s should be saying is that the Congress needs to pass a law that forces politicians to reduce the debit ceiling by some percent every year until our budget is balanced. Our problem is not the current debt ceiling. Our problem is that our budget is not balanced and on an unsustainable path upward.

There are two major reasons we spend too much.

One, the party out of office attacks the party in office for spending too much and the party in power defends the spending. When election results change, so do the positions of the parties. Congress has raised the debt ceiling 140 times since it was enacted in 1917.

By the way, the debt ceiling was created by President Wilson in order to pacify the opposition that he would not spend too much on WWI.

Two, we refuse to debate the cause of our problems. We only debate the amount of money we will spend on the symptom. For example:
1.Why does America with 5% of the world’s population spend about as much as the rest of the world does on defense? Is America responsible for most of the world? If it’s to protect democracy, why doesn’t Switzerland spend more?
2.Why hasn’t poverty been eliminated after trillions have been spent on the poor? Is poverty simply a percent of the population? Are the government and the population an enabler? Is our education system failing us? Etc. etc.
3.Why do we worry about the consumer price index (CPI)? It is only a symptom. Inflation is not a manipulated, mathematical index; it’s the increase in money supply. Should we be increasing the money supply?

I could give you a thousand examples but I think you got the idea. We need to change the way we think. Once we identify the real cause of the problem, we should be able to get consensus on how much to spend solving the problem.

By the way, America has defaulted on our debt five times starting in 1776. Also, the Federal Reserve can buy bonds to fund the government forever and never have to default on the “Public” debt (public debt is what we are talking about.)

Update on Scenario One

July 8, 2011

Scenario One still remains the most probable of my four scenarios. However, if the government or the Central Bank deviates from the “expected” course (from a capitalist point of view) other scenarios might become more probable.

Also, here are some assumptions to consider:

1. The following chart uses the S&P500 index to illustrate this scenario because it is easy to visualize.
2. My assumption is that money supply drives the economy or GDP (and there is a lag time involved here.) Increasing GDP drives business revenues and profits which then drive stock prices.
3. Money supply will slow up beginning in June but will expand when re-election fears really kick in and new “government help” adds stimulus (money creation weather it’s spending or tax reductions unless paid for) to drive up GDP in time to help with re-elections.
4. Serious spending cuts will be postponed until after the election.

Following is a brief description of each point on the chart.


Point 1. Housing bubble bursts and banks become insolvent. The government decides to save the banks by using taxpayer money to “keep them solvent” rather than demanding that the banks try to convert their bonds into equity. Recession is underway.


Point 2. March 2010. The massive increase in money supply which artificially and temporarily increases GDP begins, but results in malinvestments or bubbles. For example:
a. Interest rates reduced to zero and held there
b. Stimulus Programs begin (over $800 billion in stimulus spending and unpaid for tax cuts) plus $1.5 trillion in deficit spending,
c. Mark-to –Market accounting rules revised (allowing banks to increase the ”value” of their mortgage bonds to boost their equity and reserve requirements,
d. Central Bank buys “toxic bonds” from the banks (QE1) increasing ”excess reserves” at banks to $1.1 trillion from $4 billion,
e. November 2010, QE2 begins ($600 billion more pumped into banks but most of it ends up in foreign banks)
f. Money supply increases at double digit rates for 28 of last 29 months (see assumption 2 above.)


Point 3. May 2011. There is a “short-term” stock market top and correction due to anticipated contraction of the pace of money supply and other headwinds including slowing global growth and debt problems. For example:
a. Stimulus ending in June
b. QE2 ending in June (a and b both will contract money supply which will reduce GDP)
c. Debt ceiling “argument” (raise limit by $2-3 trillion and get more fiscal stimulus or austerity) deadline by August 2
d. Reductions in U.S. GDP (Central Bank reduces growth rate in June) and Global GDP rates
e. Increasing inflation rates (headline and core)
f. Housing still a big problem
g. Unemployment slowly getting worse
h. Earnings (Qr 2) in July should be at or near expectations but analysts are already cutting earnings for second half of 2011. It will be a negative for the markets if companies do not confirm current growth rates for second half.

Economy and markets will become more volatile and trend lower until the government “solves” the problems with more money creation, which is what I expect. Or some kind of austerity program including reduced spending is put in place, which I do not expect. However, if austerity happens, my Scenario Two (continued decrease in economy and markets) would come into play.


Point 4. Labor Day or possibly sooner (for example by the August debt ceiling limit) depending on our central planners (government and the Central Bank) the money supply will again increase raising GDP (with a lag) and then revenues, profits and markets. This up turn will last longer (with corrections along the way.)
a. My guess, debt limit increased with promise to cut spending starting in 2013 (after next elections)
b. As economy drifts lower, the pressure will be on government to “do something.” Therefore, I expect a new stimulus program (significant tax cuts because Republicans will have to vote for them and Democrats will get their stimulus because we will borrow the money displaced by the tax cuts)
c. New QE3 program (large) so central bank can continue to buy bonds and keep interest rates low (for housing, employment, etc.) This may be called something else so it can be framed differently for public consumption.
d. Timing of new stimulus for 2012 elections will become important to allow for lag time and momentum prior to elections.

Point 5. Top of Bubble (Sept-Dec 2012 +/-) caused by the huge increase in money supply added over the years and the malinvestments that have occurred as a result of this increased money supply. This bust will cause a very deep recession illustrated by the S&P500 going back down to 600-650 area.

Point 6.January 2015. Long period of stagflation with low, real GDP growth rates of 1-2% and high interest rates due to inflation.

Is The Run In Commodities Over?

No. However, in the past couple of months, commodities rose "too quickly" approaching all time highs. Silver alone, was up almost 30 percent in the past month. Profit taking was in order. Then, commodities will be on the rise again.

Why? Nothing has changed. The government is borrowing and spending money the country does not have to keep the economy afloat. It's not working:
1. GDP growth was 1.8% last quarter (and 1.7% for the past 10 years. We have been levitating the economy for a long time),
2. Housing is beginning to take a double dip (falling prices and huge inventories and 25% of people with mortgages under water),
3. Employment, wages, and hours worked are not improving,
4. Inflation is climbing (it is not transitory as Bernanke stated. He also thought subprime mortgages were small and containable, that the financial crisis was containable and transitory, etc. etc.)

In fact borrowing and printing is making matters worse. It is not only prolonging the recession, our debt is so high that it is likely to restrict economic growth in the future and we refuse to do anything about it. Austerity looks like its going to be 0 for 3. Nothing of consequence happened with the 2011 budget. It looks like nothing of consequence will happen with the debt ceiling problem and nothing of consequence will happen with the 2012 budget. But maybe we can cut 1-2% of a rising budget after the 2012 elections.

Therefore, nothing has changed. We will continue to borrow and spend to levitate the economy, reduce the value of the dollar and cause commodity prices to rise.

May 6, 2011