Posts
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
When Will The Federal Reserve Begin Printing Money?
Not being an insider, I don’t know. However, here are some of the estimates:
1.When the S&P500 gets down to 1150 (currently at 1290) where it was last December.
2.When the 10 year Treasury yield gets down to 1.5% (where it was the last time they intervened.)
3.When we get a series of really bad numbers on the economy (like the Philadelphia Fed report last week.)
4.When Chairman Bernanke “sees” prices decline (i.e., Consumer Price Index) as he fears deflation.
5.When Chairman Bernanks needs to keep the dollar from rising too high (which hurts exports and the recovery) and because he needs to support the Euro to prevent a disaster.
6.When Chairman Bernanke needs to help the European Central Bank flood the financial system with liquidity if/when Greece votes to exit the Euro and austerity.
Are We Headed For A Recession Or Another Money Bounce?
May 16, 2012
As I have been saying for some time now, the U.S. economy is headed toward “another” recession within the next few months, maybe June or July. The only thing that will temporarily stop and reverse this trend is another huge stimulus package or more money printing by the Federal Reserve.
Printing and spending more money will not solve our economic problems, it will only make matters worse in the long-term because the money will be gone and the debt will be even higher (Thanks Grandpa!) BUT, it will produce some hopium to lift the economic numbers and the market. This seems to be the politicians’ only solution to the problem. But, even this is getting more difficult to accomplish. In the first three months of this year, over $300 billion was “printed and pumped into the economy” yet GDP only increased a little over $150 billion.
There are a lot of reasons for the view described above including:
1.Money Supply. With QE’s done and the “Twist” program about to end, the pace of money coming into the economy has been slowing down for a couple of months. The pace of money injection is as important as the amount and has about six month lag time.
2.Credit. The yield curve (the price of credit over time) is being artificially held down by the Federal Reserve forcing savers and investors to take on more risk to get any yield. However, for the past few weeks, the credit markets have been telling us that an economic slowdown is coming. For, example, the yield on the 10 year Treasury is down to 1.75% and on the other side of the coin, the price of high yield instruments have been selling off (pricing in recession risk.)
3.Economic Indicators. The forty some economic indicators that come out each month have been showing many negatives, regardless of the “Headline Spin” being used to make it sound like things are improving. For example, for the past month, the weekly “Unemployment Claims” have carried headlines stating that the numbers of claims are down from the previous week. Yet, each week, they report that the claims the prior week were adjusted upward resulting in the current week’s claims being less. Net result is claims were up for the month but they were reported down each week. Shouldn’t random adjustment go in each direction?
4.There are also a lot of headwinds to be resolved like the deficit ceiling (estimate we will have to raise it again in October), 2013 budget (September), the “Doc Fix” for Medicare (December), the “Bush Tax Cuts” (December), and lots more.
Did I mention it’s an election year?
Back to paragraph one. This economy is headed for another recession and the only way politicians know how to change that trajectory is by printing more money. Therefore, I expect to see some form of QE3 or Stimulus soon; maybe at the June Fed meeting.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
A Marginal Improvement in Employment? Maybe.
May 7, 20012
April’s Non-Farm Employment Report showed an increase of 115,000 jobs plus an additional 59,000 jobs in revisions for February and March. Unemployment rate dropped to 8.1% (due to reductions in labor force participation.) This is a marginal improvement because it exceeds the estimated number of new people entering the labor force each month. Also, long-term this number is very important; but this data point is a lagging indicator not a leading indicator.
The two leading indicators in this report: (1) wages, which were unchanged (negative if inflation included) and (2) hours worked which was unchanged as well at 34.5 hours per week. The net result was a very weak report.
This means both political parties will shout that something has to be done. The Keynesian-Left wants the government to borrow even more money for another round of stimulus to “fill the gap” in consumer spending; and then reduce spending sometime in the future. The Keynesian-Right wants the government to borrow even more money to reduce taxes and stimulate supply; and then reduce spending sometime in the future. Do you think the economists or the politicians really know what supply and demand means or how it works? If they did, they would attack the cause rather than the symptom.
There are a couple of real concerns however in this jobs report. One is that the model used to seasonally adjust this data has not been adjusted for the warm winter whether. The seasonally adjusted model has now added about 4.9 million jobs (jobs the government expects will materialize in the future) which will be re-adjusted (removed) from the actual numbers later in the year. Hopefully that will happen.
The other concern is that we are loosing full-time jobs (-812,000 in April) and replacing them with part-time jobs (+508,000 in April). What kinds of jobs are being created? This trend has been going on for some time now. This may also be a reason that wages are not moving higher.
With 90,000 people entering the workforce each month, and an election only months away, this slow jobs growth problem will become very important. Can you say QE3?
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Will The Fed Print More Money?
April 12, 2012
This is an important issue right now, especially in this election year. Consensus is mixed, depending on one’s view of the “recovery”, but the market appears to have melted up in anticipation of the Fed injecting more money into the economy. Then, when the minutes of the last Fed meeting were released on March 19th, the consensus of the committee was that the economy was slowly improving but they acknowledged that employment was still a concern. Therefore, additional accommodation (printing money) by the Fed may not be necessary. However, since then, the market has begun to sell off and one reason is its disappointment with the Fed’s position to not inject more money right now. Do you think the Fed really means this? Here are some thoughts from the different sides of this argument.
The Keynesians (mostly Democrats) View
In a recent article in the New York Times, Paul Krugman argued the following:
1. Because the Fed expects low inflation and high unemployment, the Fed should be much more accommodative in order to accelerate the recovery. If we don’t, we will choke off the recovery.
2. The reason we would not be more accommodative is the Republican’s misplaced fear of inflation.
3. But, we can’t worry about inflation; we should be more worried about employment. In fact, inflation of 4-5% would be a good thing. Not a bad thing.
The Keynesian-Lite (mostly Republicans) View
In a recent report written by Brian Wesbury of First Trust, he argued the following:
1. The Fed has finally admitted the economy has improved and took QE3 off the table. There is no need to print additional money.
2. Monetary policy has been accommodative, but monetary policy is not the driving force behind the market, profits are…and profit growth will continue.
3. The Fed will start raising interest rates before its stated date of late 2014. Increasing rates will keep inflation in check.
Capitalists/Austrian Economists View
1. The economy is still in recession as none of our problems have been solved. But, the Fed has already printed too much money and is prolonging the recession with additional injections of money. The only think they have accomplished is unsustainable debt and they are laying a foundation for inflation.
2. We have printed and spent $8.5 trillion dollars in the past four years. This money has raised nominal GDP. That’s because GDP is a mathematical model in which every new dollar created adds (arguably because nominal GDP has risen only $1.4 trillion) a dollar to GDP. But now the money has been spent, we have the debt and real growth has not occurred (8 million jobs lost, 7 million homes in foreclosure, banks under capitalized, interest expenses exceed 10% of income (tax revenues), wages have not kept up with inflation, sovereign, corporate and personal debt, etc.)
3. Now however, the pace of new money creation has slowed for the past two months. Because the money created with credit has been spent, the Fed has to create more money each year than it created in the previous year or the total amount of money supply contracts…. which contracts GDP.
4. Also, Bernanke and the Fed believe we are in a cyclical recession (normal, shallow) versus a systemic recession (major, caused by structural changes.) Therefore, they believe they can fill the spending “gap” with government spending which draws consumers back into the market and ends the recession. This recession is far more serious than a temporary gap in consumer spending.
Conclusion
This recession is far more serious than a temporary gap in consumer spending.
We have below trend growth and stagnant incomes and we have an election year. Do you think the politicians will print more money and kick the can down the road past the election or opt for austerity and a return into recession? I think the answer is they will print more money, but they need “an excuse” to do so (i.e., a bad jobs number or a market sell off or a war or?) because some voters are worried about our ever increasing debt. Therefore, we are now on a path toward more money, more debt or a deeper recession.
This is an important issue right now, especially in this election year. Consensus is mixed, depending on one’s view of the “recovery”, but the market appears to have melted up in anticipation of the Fed injecting more money into the economy. Then, when the minutes of the last Fed meeting were released on March 19th, the consensus of the committee was that the economy was slowly improving but they acknowledged that employment was still a concern. Therefore, additional accommodation (printing money) by the Fed may not be necessary. However, since then, the market has begun to sell off and one reason is its disappointment with the Fed’s position to not inject more money right now. Do you think the Fed really means this? Here are some thoughts from the different sides of this argument.
The Keynesians (mostly Democrats) View
In a recent article in the New York Times, Paul Krugman argued the following:
1. Because the Fed expects low inflation and high unemployment, the Fed should be much more accommodative in order to accelerate the recovery. If we don’t, we will choke off the recovery.
2. The reason we would not be more accommodative is the Republican’s misplaced fear of inflation.
3. But, we can’t worry about inflation; we should be more worried about employment. In fact, inflation of 4-5% would be a good thing. Not a bad thing.
The Keynesian-Lite (mostly Republicans) View
In a recent report written by Brian Wesbury of First Trust, he argued the following:
1. The Fed has finally admitted the economy has improved and took QE3 off the table. There is no need to print additional money.
2. Monetary policy has been accommodative, but monetary policy is not the driving force behind the market, profits are…and profit growth will continue.
3. The Fed will start raising interest rates before its stated date of late 2014. Increasing rates will keep inflation in check.
Capitalists/Austrian Economists View
1. The economy is still in recession as none of our problems have been solved. But, the Fed has already printed too much money and is prolonging the recession with additional injections of money. The only think they have accomplished is unsustainable debt and they are laying a foundation for inflation.
2. We have printed and spent $8.5 trillion dollars in the past four years. This money has raised nominal GDP. That’s because GDP is a mathematical model in which every new dollar created adds (arguably because nominal GDP has risen only $1.4 trillion) a dollar to GDP. But now the money has been spent, we have the debt and real growth has not occurred (8 million jobs lost, 7 million homes in foreclosure, banks under capitalized, interest expenses exceed 10% of income (tax revenues), wages have not kept up with inflation, sovereign, corporate and personal debt, etc.)
3. Now however, the pace of new money creation has slowed for the past two months. Because the money created with credit has been spent, the Fed has to create more money each year than it created in the previous year or the total amount of money supply contracts…. which contracts GDP.
4. Also, Bernanke and the Fed believe we are in a cyclical recession (normal, shallow) versus a systemic recession (major, caused by structural changes.) Therefore, they believe they can fill the spending “gap” with government spending which draws consumers back into the market and ends the recession. This recession is far more serious than a temporary gap in consumer spending.
Conclusion
This recession is far more serious than a temporary gap in consumer spending.
We have below trend growth and stagnant incomes and we have an election year. Do you think the politicians will print more money and kick the can down the road past the election or opt for austerity and a return into recession? I think the answer is they will print more money, but they need “an excuse” to do so (i.e., a bad jobs number or a market sell off or a war or?) because some voters are worried about our ever increasing debt. Therefore, we are now on a path toward more money, more debt or a deeper recession.
Friday, March 30, 2012
The markets are at the top of their range, where do we go from here?
March 21, 2012
Simple question but difficult to answer. Here is the long answer.
I still think that we are getting near a tipping point with both the economy and the markets. The “economy continues to improve” groups are basing their argument on headline numbers. For example,
1. Auto sales are up slightly but inventories are even higher;
2. or an average 200,000 jobs have been created over x months but that is not enough and half the jobs are part-time and for lower wages;
3. Or manufacturing and service indexes are over 50 and therefore show “modest growth,” but are higher inventories good for the economy or just GDP index.
4. Corporate profits are high (decades high levels) and going higher (implies margins will continue to expand), but many indications that margins will contract (rising costs, gasoline hurting consumers, increasing housing foreclosures mean people have to move and pay rent rather than spending their mortgage payment on restaurants and cars, etc.)
5. The warm whether is also a factor being ignored by the Fed’s models.
At the same time, the money the Federal Reserve and deficit spending have pumped into the economy is going into the markets as Bernanke wants to get them animal spirits going; and he is being helped by the media: consumer sentiment is improving and the VIX (volatility or risk measure) is now extremely low (what risk can there be?)
“Darth Vader” on the other hand is looking at the fact that the pace of money supply(the key driver of GDP) has started to contract and that means decline for the GDP by June/July unless there is a new stimulus program or QE3+.
I think the Fed is looking for an “excuse” to print more money but it can’t look like a political move so he needs some economic data to point to in order to pull the trigger. This could be some bad economic numbers or a market correction along with a correction in gold and silver. Or it could be done through stimulus as we prepare for to engage in another war.
Net/Net: The economy remains in recession and looks to stay there for some time because we have not addressed any of the issues that brought us into this recession or are keeping us there (spending, debt, central planning, printing money, government interference in the economy and markets, etc. etc.
But, the $8 trillion dollars pumped into the economy has helped GDP’s and increased assets. This is what politicians (including Fed Reserve politicians) do. It seems to be the only thing they know how to do. Therefore, I expect another round of stimulus or money printing in time to help the elections and before the new debate on the debt limit ceiling which will likely be reached by October.
Investments must be flexible (risk on, risk off) because the exact shape and timing of the markets are unknown; and tradable (for protection and opportunities) until the longer trend becomes known.
Net/Net: The short answer is that the market is at the top of its range and can only be held there by more action from the government.
Simple question but difficult to answer. Here is the long answer.
I still think that we are getting near a tipping point with both the economy and the markets. The “economy continues to improve” groups are basing their argument on headline numbers. For example,
1. Auto sales are up slightly but inventories are even higher;
2. or an average 200,000 jobs have been created over x months but that is not enough and half the jobs are part-time and for lower wages;
3. Or manufacturing and service indexes are over 50 and therefore show “modest growth,” but are higher inventories good for the economy or just GDP index.
4. Corporate profits are high (decades high levels) and going higher (implies margins will continue to expand), but many indications that margins will contract (rising costs, gasoline hurting consumers, increasing housing foreclosures mean people have to move and pay rent rather than spending their mortgage payment on restaurants and cars, etc.)
5. The warm whether is also a factor being ignored by the Fed’s models.
At the same time, the money the Federal Reserve and deficit spending have pumped into the economy is going into the markets as Bernanke wants to get them animal spirits going; and he is being helped by the media: consumer sentiment is improving and the VIX (volatility or risk measure) is now extremely low (what risk can there be?)
“Darth Vader” on the other hand is looking at the fact that the pace of money supply(the key driver of GDP) has started to contract and that means decline for the GDP by June/July unless there is a new stimulus program or QE3+.
I think the Fed is looking for an “excuse” to print more money but it can’t look like a political move so he needs some economic data to point to in order to pull the trigger. This could be some bad economic numbers or a market correction along with a correction in gold and silver. Or it could be done through stimulus as we prepare for to engage in another war.
Net/Net: The economy remains in recession and looks to stay there for some time because we have not addressed any of the issues that brought us into this recession or are keeping us there (spending, debt, central planning, printing money, government interference in the economy and markets, etc. etc.
But, the $8 trillion dollars pumped into the economy has helped GDP’s and increased assets. This is what politicians (including Fed Reserve politicians) do. It seems to be the only thing they know how to do. Therefore, I expect another round of stimulus or money printing in time to help the elections and before the new debate on the debt limit ceiling which will likely be reached by October.
Investments must be flexible (risk on, risk off) because the exact shape and timing of the markets are unknown; and tradable (for protection and opportunities) until the longer trend becomes known.
Net/Net: The short answer is that the market is at the top of its range and can only be held there by more action from the government.
Friday, March 9, 2012
Is It Decision Time for the 2012 Economy?
The media has been reporting for some time, based on "expert" opinions, that we are in a recovery and that the economy is slowly getting better. There are some data points that are getting better. Afterall, we should get some nominal improvement after the government spent about $10 trillion in the last three years (40% of it borrowed) and the Federal Reserve printed another $3 trillion over the past four years. But, the problem is that it's only temporary. The improvement only lasts as long as the printing presses are running. The net is that the market is being held up by printing money but the economy itself is not improving much.
Now however, we are running out of previously printed money. Quantitative Easing (QE1 and QE2) and the Feds "Twist Program" are winding down. So going forward, we can't get an increase in nominal GDP growth. Therefore, GDP will now start to decline. For example, Goldman Sachs revised its estimate of GDP in the first quarter down twice lat Friday and Bank of America is now at 1.8% for the first quarter. We must print more money to get an increase in GDP.
Yes, both political parties know this and the Federal Reserve knows this as well. But, with current debt at close to $16 trillion, some people are saying no to more debt. Therefore, the government needs to "prove" we need more money printing. After all, elections will be here soon. So, the Federal Reserve needs some bad numbers now to justify printing more money. I wonder about Friday's jobs number. Maybe if gold and silver dropped in value, it would show that debasing the dollar by printing money wasn't the reason for its rise in value. Or maybe a quick hit to the stock market would generate enough fear to do the trick. And, oil needs to come down in price because you can't start a war with oil over $100 per barrel. Or?
The net is this; we could be at a tipping point. Either we side back into recession or we print more money and "jump start" the economy, again.
Now however, we are running out of previously printed money. Quantitative Easing (QE1 and QE2) and the Feds "Twist Program" are winding down. So going forward, we can't get an increase in nominal GDP growth. Therefore, GDP will now start to decline. For example, Goldman Sachs revised its estimate of GDP in the first quarter down twice lat Friday and Bank of America is now at 1.8% for the first quarter. We must print more money to get an increase in GDP.
Yes, both political parties know this and the Federal Reserve knows this as well. But, with current debt at close to $16 trillion, some people are saying no to more debt. Therefore, the government needs to "prove" we need more money printing. After all, elections will be here soon. So, the Federal Reserve needs some bad numbers now to justify printing more money. I wonder about Friday's jobs number. Maybe if gold and silver dropped in value, it would show that debasing the dollar by printing money wasn't the reason for its rise in value. Or maybe a quick hit to the stock market would generate enough fear to do the trick. And, oil needs to come down in price because you can't start a war with oil over $100 per barrel. Or?
The net is this; we could be at a tipping point. Either we side back into recession or we print more money and "jump start" the economy, again.
Sovereign Bond Risks to Increase Significantly
February 21, 2012
If you remember, we were frightened when the U.S. Government threw out two hundred years of settled law when they arbitrarily threw out the superior claims of General Motors' bondholders in favor of the subordinated claims of the shareholders and unions. But, we have since dismissed this incident as being just against one company; and besides it was politically expedient.
However, we did the exact opposite in the financial crisis when we saved the bondholders with public funds. Again, it was politically expedient.
Saturday, the European Central Bank (ECB) did something they may regret later. They exchanged their existing Greek bonds for "New Greek" bonds that are not subject to the "collective action clause" (which allows a supermajority of bondholders to agree to a debt restructuring.) Now, under the new terms, the ECB has first claim to Greek assets over all other bondholders. They did this without the other bondholders consent and without objection from other European nations.
In other words, the ECB can now retroactively change the terms of any bond contract. For example, who has the superior claims against assets, the interest rates, the maturities, etc. at any time it's to their advantage and without bondholder acceptance. No rule of law. No judicial appeal.
Bond buyers will now have to reassess the current value of European bonds for this new risk and then evaluated them against U.S. Treasuries where we have had the rule of law. This increased risk should have an impact on Europe and on our markets.
If you remember, we were frightened when the U.S. Government threw out two hundred years of settled law when they arbitrarily threw out the superior claims of General Motors' bondholders in favor of the subordinated claims of the shareholders and unions. But, we have since dismissed this incident as being just against one company; and besides it was politically expedient.
However, we did the exact opposite in the financial crisis when we saved the bondholders with public funds. Again, it was politically expedient.
Saturday, the European Central Bank (ECB) did something they may regret later. They exchanged their existing Greek bonds for "New Greek" bonds that are not subject to the "collective action clause" (which allows a supermajority of bondholders to agree to a debt restructuring.) Now, under the new terms, the ECB has first claim to Greek assets over all other bondholders. They did this without the other bondholders consent and without objection from other European nations.
In other words, the ECB can now retroactively change the terms of any bond contract. For example, who has the superior claims against assets, the interest rates, the maturities, etc. at any time it's to their advantage and without bondholder acceptance. No rule of law. No judicial appeal.
Bond buyers will now have to reassess the current value of European bonds for this new risk and then evaluated them against U.S. Treasuries where we have had the rule of law. This increased risk should have an impact on Europe and on our markets.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)