Friday, February 22, 2013

More Of The Same

February 13, 2013

Opinion


The President's message last night was, as expected, simply more of the same: More spending and more taxes.

It was expected because the presumptive opinion in America (as defined by politicians, economists and the media) is that the government will find a way to deal with our problems -whatever they are- and that we do not need to worry.

This view, made popular during FDR's reign and reinforced and expanded since by both political parties, believe that the government can and should inject itself into the economy because the economy needs to be managed. That market forces cannot do the job.

The president said we need to do more. I interpret that to mean we need to take more money from the people who earned it, the producers, because the 50-60+% percent being taken now isn't enough or even fair. And besides, the government knows how to spend this money better than the people who earned it.

You may think differently but right now we live, work and invest in this Keynesian world; therefore, going forward we can expect the following:

1. Governments (all levels) will continue to spend excessively and borrow or print more money because there is no incentive to stop (see ZIRP below.) When the States get into trouble, they believe the Federal Government will bail them out.

2. The Federal Reserve will continue their Zero Interest Rate Program (ZIRP) for as long as they can to help banks (it's their job); and to keep interest rates low to "help" people buy/refinance their homes. And maybe one other thing, the Federal Government can't afford to have rates rise because every 1% rise in interest rates will cost the government over $150 billion per year in additional interest.

3. Currently, the Federal Government is running close to $100 billion per month in deficit spending and the Federal Reserve is printing and pumping in another $105 billion per month. The results so far are not too good however. Preliminary Fourth Quarter GDP decreased at an annual rate of -0.1%. But, it's only been four years.

4. Normally, increasing money supply causes inflation. However, even with the trillions of dollars injected into the economy, we do not see inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI.) One reason is of course the way CPI is calculated. The other is that the money being injected by the Fed is going directly into the banks. The banks are not lending the money because they can make more money by buying assets (stocks, bonds, currencies, foreign investments, etc.)  

4. Therefore, we have a kind of stealth inflation because real inflation is not visible in the usual places. However, inflation is visible in asset prices (stocks, bonds, metals, etc.) because that is where the banks are "investing" their free or almost free money from the Fed.

5. This kind of malinvestments will eventually cause "cost-push inflation" (increased costs of materials including energy and labor will force prices up and thereby reduce supply.) Reduced supply then causes prices to increase.

6. Today, the government cannot raise rates to combat rising prices (remember Paul Volker) because U.S. debt is too large and interest on the debt would become unaffordable. Nominal rates on the 10-year Treasury of 5% would increase interest payments close to the size of the Defense budget.

So what do we know after the President's speech? The government is going to keep pumping money into the economy raising nominal GDP, asset prices (including the markets) and inflation. We will need to continue investing like a Keynesian whether you believe in this dogma or not, but keep an eye out for the black swan.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Which Housing Story Is More Important?

January 31, 2012

Two versions of the S&P/Case Shiller Composite Housing Index for November were published yesterday.

Story one. The CBS/CNBC version carried the following main points:
  1. Headline: "Home prices gain for 10th month in row"" 
  2. Conclusion: "a string of gains point to a housing market that is on the mend" 
  3. Reason for conclusion: " the S&P/Case Shiller Composite Index of 20 metropolitan areas gained 0.6% in November on a seasonally adjusted basis, in line with economists' forecasts."
Story two. Article from Market Watch (WSJ) frames the story differently and at takes a closer look:
  1. Headline: " November home prices tick down" 
  2. Conclusion: Housing is clearly recovering."
  3. Reason for conclusion: ..."the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city composite index posted a non-seasonally adjusted 0.1% decrease in November following a 0.2% decrease in October. (However,) "After seasonal adjustments, the 20-city house-price index rose 0.6% in November ...and prices were 5.5% higher year-over-year."
Note NBC uses seasonally adjusted data only while Market Watch uses both. S&P/Case-Shiller recommends using non-seasonally adjusted data and year-over-year data for the trend.

For the casual reader, this difference may not seen that important. However, for the aggressive reader who is always looking for possible trend changes, this could be important and needs to be watched. For example:

            1. Since prices do not rise forever, maybe after 12 months, this (two month negative) could be the beginning of a correction?  
           
            2. Will prices continue to rise throughout 2013? They will have to if housing is going to contribute to GDP growth the way most economists believe it will. 

Always question data.

The U.S Jobless Claims Drop To 5-Year Low. Really?


Friday January 25, 20012


The media reported yesterday that weekly unemployment claims dropped by 5,000 to a 5-Year low. This is a great example of why media stories are so misleading. Here are the main points made by the Associated Press (AP) story:

1. U.S. jobless claims drop to a 5-year low of 330,000 which is a hopeful sign for the job market.
2. (This) is evidence that employers are cutting fewer jobs and may step up hiring.
3. The 330,000 to 390,000 weekly average of claims and the average increase of 150,000 new jobs per month is enough to slowly push down the unemployment rate which fell 0.7% to 7.8% last year.

As you know, this (150,000 new jobs per month) is not the reason for the drop in the employment rate.This amount just keeps up with the number of people entering the labor force. In fact, people dropping out of the labor force is the primary reason the unemployment rate dropped.

This is not an isolated example of "misinterpreted media facts" or simply one story as many news outlets use the AP releases as the basis for their stories.

Here is the problem. It's not the complete story. They did not mention that three states (California, Virginia, and Hawaii) did not report due to weather issus and a holiday. So, the government made an "educated guess" as to what the number of claims would be from those states. Then they ran all the data through their seasonally adjusted model to arrive at the 330,000 claims.

As many of you know, an important step in my critical thinking process is to always ask yourself what data is missing from the story. You also know they don't have the time or space to include every piece of information. You already knew there was a holiday last week and you knew -if you follow the weekly reports- that this is the lowest number in years. That makes this report unusual and therefore questionable. You have to put the data in context before you can evaluate the argument (a hopeful sign, may step up hiring and the reason the unemployment rate declined) before you can really evaluate this new informaiton.

By the way, this information is available on the government's website. Maybe the writer just didn't have enough time to do the story correctly.