Posts
As you know, I understand that stimulus money drives up the GDP numbers making it look like the economy is getting better, but I have been very concerned about 2010 because of many impending headwinds:
1. Mortgage delinquencies about to rise significantly. Note, we are now entering the 2005-07 period when the option-ARM’s made up the majority of mortgages (pay what you want to per month and we will add the unpaid balance of principal and interest due to your mortgage)
2. Banks will have to report, for the first time, off balance sheet assets in their first quarter reports,
3. Unemployment is high and probably getting worse (except for government census workers),
4. Mortgage resets have started to rise and with about 25% of homes underwater, there may be no way for most people to refinance,
5. Home inventories are high (over nine months supply at the current sales pace) plus significant shadow inventory (from banks and home owners) is waiting to come on the market when times improve,
6. Current taxes and fees are poised to increase significantly and new forms of taxes (like a national sales tax) may be required to fund our unsustainable spending,
7. State (and local) budgets are in trouble (estimates are from a $200 to $300 billion deficit) and Governors are asking for more help from the Federal Government (who has no money), and
8. Consumers still very over-leveraged.
That’s enough. I am not trying to get you depressed; I just wanted to make a point.
I am trying to understand why the market continues to rise and why traders are apparently throwing risk out the window again. Bears are down to a low 21%. Then I learned about Richard Russell’s latest newsletter. He publishes the DOW Theory Newsletter and is one of the most respected market analysts anywhere. Plus, almost “everyone” buys his newsletter including Goldman, hedge funds, the Bank of China, etc. In his latest newsletter, he explains that he expected the market to close below a critical number (10,750) last Friday which would have turned the market negative. However, during the final six minutes of trading, volume suddenly surged and lifted the DOW above the critical level of 10,750. This was very unusual and caused him to ask:
“Where did that very late buying come from? I have to think this was one of the most flagrant cases of manipulation that I have every seen. Was it the Fed; was it Goldman or Morgan Stanley buying futures on orders from the Fed?”
Note: he is not enamored with the Fed to begin with. But, it got me thinking.
Fiscal and monetary policy is being run by Keynesians (and has been since FDR.) Keynesians believe that in a crisis, you quickly lower rates, print money and then stimulate the economy to fill the drop or gap in spending. If you stimulate enough, the economy (GDP) will “climb” and soon consumers will believe the economy is coming back and will start growing again. The return of the consumer completes the circle and allows the government to hand off the economy, once again, to the private sector.
Now to complete this conspiracy theory, imagine the Fed and the Treasury sitting around wondering how they are going to get the economy going again when “the demand-side” or consumer is over leveraged and can’t buy or borrow money and the banks can’t lend because of impending asset losses and the capital asset requirements needed to remain solvent.
I am not a conspiracy theorist by nature, but I am having a difficult time understanding this market and continue to search for answers.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Friday, March 12, 2010
Are Our Economic Woes Behind Us Or Ahead Of Us?
The way the market has been performing (Dow hitting a high of 10,750 in September and now six months later, with volatility, it is almost flat at 10,550.) Does that mean our woes are behind us or still in front of us? Following are a Macro and Micro view of what is occurring and what might occur.
The Aggregated or Macro View of the Economy
There seems to be two overriding views of the economy. The first is that both demand-side and Supply-side economists (Keynesians) see the economy through the lens of an aggregated economic model or the GDP. When you look at the economy this way, you see the “big picture;” but you don’t see the depth or interrelationships among elements within the economy.
For example, you see the economy growing at 5.9% in the fourth quarter---exactly what, you as a Keynesian, expect. This gives you confidence that the government is doing the right things to fix the economy. First, monetary policy: lowering interest rates and expanding the money supply and than fiscal policy: providing stimulus to get the economy back to normal and subsequently growing.
Now, with the economy focused in Washington (where the money is) and the math looking better: 5.9% growth; you could see our woes as being behind us. Even though Q4 inventory adjustments contributed 3.4% of the 5.9% GDP growth and inventories actually fell $39 billion. That’s the way the GDP model works and you could say that since it fell at a slower pace, things are getting better.
I think the macro conclusion is that things are turning around and with some additional stimulus; the government can keep this economy growing.
The Capitalist or Micro View Of the Economy
The other view, the capitalist view, sees the economy as interactions between individuals (micro view) rather than as an aggregated model (macro view.) Therefore, they look at how the pieces of the economy work on a supply-demand basis with constantly adjusting prices to achieve equilibrium.
This view sees the 5.9% GDP growth but looks at the longer-term implications. For example, in 2010 we are going to get another peak in mortgage resets (July) at a very high level of about $97 billion and remain high through September of 2011. Once this second wave of resets begins (which was in November of 2009) it takes about three months to get delinquencies reported and another three months before we get foreclosure notices. How many mortgages actually go into foreclosure we can only guess? But it will be in the millions.
The government could forestall some of these foreclosures through various programs (loan modification, not letting homes go into foreclosure until they have been rejected by a loan modification program, continuing to allow buyers to make 4% down payments and subsidizing them with $8,000 cash, etc.)
Also, bank credit remains very tight. Banks are not only restricting loans, the Federal Reserve is telling them not to increase dividends or buy back stock so they can continue to build up reserves. If this doesn’t make it difficult to get loans, the a new accounting rule that goes into effect in the first quarter of 2010 which requires banks to disclose their off balance sheet investment vehicles, will make it even more difficult. The only company we’ve heard from so far is Freddie Mac and they said they may be considered insolvent when they report. They are however; going to continue buying mortgage backed securities that are at least four months delinquent (no worry, they are tax payer owned.)
Are our woes behind us or ahead of us?
We don’t know. If the government continues to kick the can down the road on mortgages and allows the banks to continue to increase assets, it could keep the economy going in the short term. But if mortgage foreclosures become a major problem (number of, no credit, continued unemployment, etc.) we could get another step down. Watch the GDP numbers, watch the delinquency filings, and watch the first-quarter bank results.
The Aggregated or Macro View of the Economy
There seems to be two overriding views of the economy. The first is that both demand-side and Supply-side economists (Keynesians) see the economy through the lens of an aggregated economic model or the GDP. When you look at the economy this way, you see the “big picture;” but you don’t see the depth or interrelationships among elements within the economy.
For example, you see the economy growing at 5.9% in the fourth quarter---exactly what, you as a Keynesian, expect. This gives you confidence that the government is doing the right things to fix the economy. First, monetary policy: lowering interest rates and expanding the money supply and than fiscal policy: providing stimulus to get the economy back to normal and subsequently growing.
Now, with the economy focused in Washington (where the money is) and the math looking better: 5.9% growth; you could see our woes as being behind us. Even though Q4 inventory adjustments contributed 3.4% of the 5.9% GDP growth and inventories actually fell $39 billion. That’s the way the GDP model works and you could say that since it fell at a slower pace, things are getting better.
I think the macro conclusion is that things are turning around and with some additional stimulus; the government can keep this economy growing.
The Capitalist or Micro View Of the Economy
The other view, the capitalist view, sees the economy as interactions between individuals (micro view) rather than as an aggregated model (macro view.) Therefore, they look at how the pieces of the economy work on a supply-demand basis with constantly adjusting prices to achieve equilibrium.
This view sees the 5.9% GDP growth but looks at the longer-term implications. For example, in 2010 we are going to get another peak in mortgage resets (July) at a very high level of about $97 billion and remain high through September of 2011. Once this second wave of resets begins (which was in November of 2009) it takes about three months to get delinquencies reported and another three months before we get foreclosure notices. How many mortgages actually go into foreclosure we can only guess? But it will be in the millions.
The government could forestall some of these foreclosures through various programs (loan modification, not letting homes go into foreclosure until they have been rejected by a loan modification program, continuing to allow buyers to make 4% down payments and subsidizing them with $8,000 cash, etc.)
Also, bank credit remains very tight. Banks are not only restricting loans, the Federal Reserve is telling them not to increase dividends or buy back stock so they can continue to build up reserves. If this doesn’t make it difficult to get loans, the a new accounting rule that goes into effect in the first quarter of 2010 which requires banks to disclose their off balance sheet investment vehicles, will make it even more difficult. The only company we’ve heard from so far is Freddie Mac and they said they may be considered insolvent when they report. They are however; going to continue buying mortgage backed securities that are at least four months delinquent (no worry, they are tax payer owned.)
Are our woes behind us or ahead of us?
We don’t know. If the government continues to kick the can down the road on mortgages and allows the banks to continue to increase assets, it could keep the economy going in the short term. But if mortgage foreclosures become a major problem (number of, no credit, continued unemployment, etc.) we could get another step down. Watch the GDP numbers, watch the delinquency filings, and watch the first-quarter bank results.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)